Political Idea :: essays research papers

Throughout time there hand over always been some philosophers who present theories, which have philosophical themes in religious thinking that, are in connection to current social and governmental ideas. Thinkers like St. Anselm, St. Thomas Aquinas, and John Hick all express their views and feelings on the existence of matinee idol, as well as the human race. Their theories are establish off asking questions like why are we here and how do we parent Gods existence? Is there really smell after death and where does the soul go? They also explore the ideas and theories butt end the character of man and what relationship that has with the existence of God. With one goal in mind, at three different times in history each(prenominal) have resulted in the same conclusion, that God does exist and his existence is a result of knowing and understanding why he exists. They all prove their theories in different ways, but their outcome is one in the same.St. Anselm takes the ontological ar gument to explain to existence of God. An ontological argument is simply an abridgment of the nature or existence of something, where we would attempt to define the object, to understand its nature and to be able to list all its qualities and attributes. However, it is important to keep in mind the difference between beance and reality when using the ontological argument to define Gods existence. There are things that appear to be real in the presence of God, but are then that an image of the mind. Anselm begins first with the meaning of the word God. According to roughly Jews and Christians, the term God means one that is greatest in power, in knowledge, in goodness and in reality which then stack be translated to be God is conceived as the most perfect being. Since this view of God that accords with the faith commitments of most believers, Anselm uses it in his ontological analysis. His definition becomes that being than which no(prenominal) greater can be conceived, makin g God not only the greatest being, but yet the greatest conceivable being.Based on Anselms definition he makes the argument that for a being that exists twain in understanding and in reality, which would be greater than a being existing in understanding alone. Therefore, as Anselm stated even a fool is convinced that something exists in the understanding, at least, than which nothing greater can be conceived.