A Comparison of Two Leaders

His upbeat disposition and gentle style has make him one of the great leaders of the NFG. Although Ben Franklin lived a very long metre ago, people still speak highly of the valet and his accomplishments. English historiographer Lewis Simpson stated well-nigh Franklin that he was always terse, luminous, simple, pregnant with meaning, and eminently telling (Stout 613). Eugene Weber describes Franklin as urbane, tactful, and dedicated (Weber 19). Franklins good humor and outgoing personality helped him to be elected and selected for umteen different public offices during his life.Franklin was a man of few failings, but the ones he had caused him some serious trouble. art object dower as the emissary to England, he would not listen to public opinions active America that did not fit with his views (Weber 19). This got him into trouble with the English and he left wing the country bitter towards Its citizens. Franklin withal spent many years from shoes and away from his famil y. HIS relationship with his son deteriorated until his son joined the British to fence against America and his father. Although I could not find anyone who had anything bad to say about Tony Dungy, he, eke Franklin, spent a lot of period away from home.NFG coaches spend many long hours at the office and many days away from home. This time away caused strains in his family relationships and may take in been a contributing broker in the suicide death of his son Jamie In 2005 (Morning 34). When it comes to leaders styles some(prenominal) men continue to have a lot in common. Tony Dungs leaders style is a blend of both consideration and initiating structure styles. Tony likes to discipline with his followers leading them in the correct direction, but he also gives them lee way to make their own decisions.When off the field he uses a lolling approach to maintain order and keep his players in line. Jim Caldwell, Tonys instruct Leader. In the example Jim rec completelys Tony tell ing players to be good function models while showing clips of athletes that had hotfoot against the wrong side of the law (Dungy VII-VIII). fleck on the field he would use various styles from telling, to selling, and even a participating style allowing players to give input on what play to run next. It is this intense relational style that caused Jim Caldwell to declare that Tony Dungy leadership DNA dead fit the description off Level 5 leader (Dungy X). WhileDungs leadership style was a blend, Franklin adjusted his leadership style to fit his role. While in public office Franklin displayed a directive style of leadership to get the job done. When working with the other leaders of the new America, Franklin took on an Advisory role (Lane 42). He used his wit and wisdom to campaign and advise them through the new challenges that now faced them. He also used an advisory role while serving as envoy to England and France. In conclusion I would like to answer the question if they cou ld have switched places in time. Even putting aside the vast difference in time and the fact that an AfricanAmerican would not have been accepted in Franklins position, I think the answer is no they could not have switched. Though both men exemplify what it is to be a leader, their roles in history and on those around them were very different. Franklin is an extrovert and enjoyed the public eye while Dungy is an introvert and would find it difficult to be around that many people all the time. Franklins fame is inexorably tied to his inventions as well, something Dungy could not have duplicated. Franklin, although fond of sports and the outdoors, I dont would have been happy in Just one career as a NFG coach.