'Confused and DazedConfused and Dazed Essay\r'

'At the risk of look â€Å"cliché-ish”, in serveing the head word of whether or non I thought the account of the play was every ab let out a military personnel who could not induce up his legal opinion, my answer would be yes. If ever in that respect was a man who contemplated life until it absolutely absorbed him into a pitiful peace-less mentality it was juncture. The above mentioned cliché is from the ever famous run III Scene I:\r\nTo be, or not to be: that is the question:\r\nWhether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer\r\nThe slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,\r\nOr to take arms against a ocean of troubles,\r\nAnd by opposing end them?\r\n ‘To be, or not to be’ has been quoted, misquoted, used out of context, and has been said enough that little children leave inhabit the line before they know who Hamlet is. However, to further support my answer to the above question, man has contemplated life in many different ways. For Hamlet to avow ‘to be, or not to be: that is the question’ is to say he is conveying alone that has him perplexed. In those ten words lies more(prenominal) depth of thought than throne be demonstrated in the writing of this essay. But, at that place is hope for mankind in that some have dared to answer the question, rightly translated ‘to exist or not to live?’\r\nIs it nobler to prize or act? Does the act of thinking, (in the mind to suffer), lessen the blows of life that wealth and fame can bring? Hamlet would say it makes no difference. Hamlet is not the first man to set out to perform a specific task and get side-tracked by so many distractions that grab at the mind like children in a candy store. Is it nobler? ane would have to describe ‘nobler.’ A good example of his more righteous (nobler) thought was act to decide, at heart this same passage, if end would be a copout to living. If he thought he could be considered a noble man by dying, then he would certainly be obliged to do so. However, there were all those other thoughts nagging at him.\r\nOne such thought, sidetrack or abeyance is found when he comes into the room where his start out is crying because Claudius is upset with her. The ill Claudius was feeling, though, could not be compared to what Hamlet was feeling. In a scene that can only be described as confusion trying to make sense of chaos, Hamlet manages to push down someone he suspects is Claudius hiding privy the tapestry. In the one moment he decides to act, he blows it royally (no pun intended).\r\nIt is value the mention that Hamlet does get roughly to doing both what he had revenged to do to Claudius and himself. But, in the end of the play there is the judgement that he still could not make up his mind. Laertes forgives Hamlet for his and his father’s death and was also concerned that Hamlet would not blame him either. Hamlet does it as only Hamlet could; in his dying breath, after all the time he spent contemplating life and death he says: â€Å"Had I but timeâ€â€Å".\r\n'