Thursday, January 2, 2014

Patriot Act

Zeljak , C (2004 , May /June . The USA and Civil Liberties (Part II . Problems of carry-over Communism 51 , 69-71In her article , Cathy Zeljak maintains that the has infringed on Americans civil liberties , oddly the Fourth Amendment s protections against guilty searches and watchfulness Using the recent floor of legal decisions on law enforcement agencies information-gathering practices , the author argues that the strips citizens of the legal protections they safe in the late 1970s . Throughout the piece , she asks , ar we sacrificing essential liberties in the fight against terrorism (Zeljak , 2004 ,. 69 , and her learn (the overriding thesis of this article ) is yesZeljak argues that the undermines both the Fourth Amendment and the conflicting Intelligence Surveillance (FISA ) Act , which was passed in 19 78 to impose guidelines on political sympathies cargon of private citizens . Before then , political science surveillance of citizens lacked correct guidelines , and authorities agencies behaved arbitrarily as a result Supposed threats like antiwar activists and civil-rights leaders like Martin Luther overstep executive , were frequently monitored and harassed . The FISA Act aimed to curb these abuses and fit(p) more(prenominal) legal guidelines on federal surveillance , requiring that foreign news had to be a primary cause for issuing a warrant to conduct surveillance on an case-by-caseHowever , the has removed many of the FISA Act s protections , now allowing warrants to be issued with foreign intelligence purposes as only a tangential reason , not a primary cause In addition , law enforcement officials may now seize a across-the-boardr array of records , using the wide definition any tangible thing (Zeljak 2004 ,. 70 ) phase of of the narrow lists specifie d by the FISA Act .
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The also allows government agencies to spy on innocent third parties as a means of obtaining information about primary suspects further reassign the Fourth Amendment s protections , and it allows agencies to share information more freely , without allow accused unmarrieds known what evidence exists against themIn March 2002 , FISC rejected can buoy Ashcroft s proposals to allow law enforcement officials broader access to (and use of ) information collected under the . In effect , says Zeljak , this transferred fundamental rights away from individual citizens , greatly increasing the authority of intelligence and investigative ag encies (Zeljak , 2004 ,. 70 . FISA warrants can thus be used for criminal investigations without clarify probable causeZeljak also claims that , despite two court defeats on this issue , the Bush administration hopes to further expand its surveillance and prosecutory powers with II , which would automatically grant federal agents who conduct sinful searches complete immunity and allow the government to deport American citizens found guilty of helping terrorist organizations . Basically , she maintains , such an refinement of the would allow the government near-investigations with few legal guidelines , and would considerably decorate citizens protections and civil liberties . Zeljak concludes the article by stating that Americans must wonder whether we are sacrificing essential liberties in the fight against terrorism and ends with a raise question : . have the...If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website: Orde rCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a fu! ll essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment