Thank You for Smoking? Essay -- Peter Brimelow Tobacco Essays

Thank You for Smoking?Peter Brimelow brings to light an interesting caprice in his set more or less Thank You for Smoking? Brimelows purpose of his essay is to defend smoking. He provides the interview with information that is worthy of their consideration and validated enough to make them think twice about how they stand on the issue of smoking. Unfortunately, just about flaws in Brimelows technique distract the audience from his message that smoking is not as unhealthy as it appears. A few mistakes transform his work from a well-written argumentative essay to an winless attempt to spread his beliefs. What started as an essay to rouse new views on the issue of smoking swiftly lost all merit and became a means to assail the people in opposition of the authors views. Brimelow makes a gallant suit to prove his major(ip) claim, or of import idea (McFadden). He wants to get the audience to concur with him that smoking is not an altogether unhealthy habit (Brimelow 141). How ever, mistakes in his essay begin with his major claim statement. When Brimelow writes that smoking might be, in some ways, good for you (141), he already puts doubts in the minds of the audience. Instead of feeling that the author is confident about his position on the subject, the audience picks up on the skepticism unsung in the course might and some small ways. Those qualifiers, or words and phrases that exclude some situations from his major claim (McFadden), leave the audience unbelieving who it is beneficial for and in what situations. Brimelow uses warrants, or peoples values (McFadden), to get them to coincide with his beliefs. Because Brimelows main claim is very disputable, he needs to find some way to catch the attention of the audience a... ... the mistakes he has made. When his audience looks cover version on the essay they hand over just read, his examples and facts about smoking that have been so keenly expressed go forth be unseen, because the focus will be on the unprofessional fallacies present in his work. In early works, it would be advantageous for Brimelow to be aware of these fallacies and to find a dissimilar means of approaching his rebuttal so that another strenuous effort will not be diminished into an unsuccessful attempt to break down his beliefs.Works CitedBrimelow, Peter. Thank You for Smoking? The Genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. capital of Massachusetts Thomson Heinle, 1998. 141-143.Clark, Irene L. The Genre of Argument. Boston Thomson Heinle, 1998.McFadden, James. Introduction to Toulmin Method. Lecture. Sept. 13 & 14, 2003. Buena Vista University. Storm Lake, IA.